Rebrand as Semantika with honest, inspiration-based claims
Applies the brand platform consistently across the codebase: - Name: Semantika everywhere — app name/slug/scheme, bundle ids (com.semantika.app), workspace package names, CDK stack, Cognito domain prefix, secret name (semantika/app), database name, product ids (semantika_monthly/_yearly), and storage keys. - System instructions: Semantika is positioned as an intelligent reflection partner — not therapy, not self-help, not a course. It starts by exploring how the user interprets their situation and supports reflection and perspective-taking rather than delivering finished answers. Tone rules added: never judging, dramatic, overenthusiastic or preaching; always calm, curious, clear, respectful, structured, thoughtful. - Honest claims: instructions and knowledge base now explicitly frame neurosemantics and NLP as models and inspiration for reflection, not scientifically established methods — including a note that several NLP claims lack support in controlled studies. Claiming or implying proven effects is forbidden. - README: brand section (position, promise, mission, vision, positioning, tone, design words) and updated product philosophy. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0118DaxZR36RpnY524vRqx3z
This commit is contained in:
@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@ nervous system) and semantics (meaning, language, symbols) interact to produce
|
||||
our experienced reality. The field was developed primarily by L. Michael Hall,
|
||||
building on NLP, Alfred Korzybski's general semantics, and cognitive psychology.
|
||||
|
||||
**Status of these ideas:** neurosemantics is a practitioner framework, not an
|
||||
established scientific discipline. Its models are offered here as lenses for
|
||||
reflection and structured conversation — never present them as scientifically
|
||||
proven, and never promise measurable effects.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core ideas
|
||||
|
||||
- **Meaning is constructed, not found.** Events have no inherent meaning; we
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user