Files
Claude 031d6d5a3d All produktdokumentation på engelska som källa
De återstående dokumenten — VISION, MVP, DEMO, DRIFT och MASTER-PROMPT —
får engelska versioner, och de svenska blir översättningar med samma
notis som systembeskrivningen redan hade. DRIFT.md heter nu
OPERATIONS.md; ett svenskt filnamn på ett engelskt dokument hade varit
inkonsekvent.

Dokumentationen är därmed 33 filer: sexton dokument med engelska som
källa, sexton svenska syskon, och systembeskrivningen dessutom på tyska,
danska och norska.

Två fel hittades under översättningen, båda rättade i bägge språken:

DRIFT.md pekade ut .github/workflows/ci.yml som Guidad Felsöknings CI
och sa tre rader längre ned att samma fil tillhör Semantika och inte
rörs. Det stämde innan CI flyttades till egen Gitea; rätt fil är
.gitea/workflows/felsokning.yml.

MVP.md kallade styrdokumentet Master Prompt v1.0 men länkade till v2.0.

Att översätta ett dokument är den grundligaste läsning det får. Båda
felen hade överlevt flera genomgångar av samma text på svenska.

Kodidentifierare, miljövariabler, sökvägar och UI-etiketter står
oöversatta i de engelska versionerna. Att skriva "Create demo case" i
demomanuset hade gjort manuset obrukbart — knappen heter "Skapa
demoärende".

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012EQg3rJsrQ1ZNTvkzmQAtt
2026-08-04 20:25:45 +00:00

3.7 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

Guidad Felsökning — demo script

Canonical version. Swedish: DEMO.sv.md.

A 510 minute script for showing the platform. Everything runs locally, with no accounts and no keys.

Preparation

npm install
npm run dev

Open http://localhost:8080/felsokning — ideally on a phone, or in mobile mode in the browser (the app is built for the workshop floor). Enter a name (everything is logged per user).

Chrome is recommended: voice input (push-to-talk) then works as well.

Demo flow

1. The dashboard and the demo case (1 min)

Click Skapa demoärende (Volvo XC60, vibration) — create demo case. A complete case with 1 h 35 min of work history is loaded: identified object, answered symptom questions, four wheel photos, measured values, a road test, a handover between two technicians, and a hypothesis.

The point to make: the dashboard shows only what matters — in progress, done, new case.

2. The case brief (2 min)

Open the case → the Brief tab. This is the core argument:

  • Checks performed with results — not just tick boxes.
  • Not checked — derived automatically from the methodology; what causes duplicated work at shift change is the thing nobody wrote down that nobody did.
  • Hypotheses clearly marked 🔴 — the system never presents a hypothesis as a confirmed fault.
  • Reliability and total working time.

The point: a new technician is productive in under a minute, without reading hundreds of log lines.

3. The guide and verified checklists (2 min)

The Guide tab. The methodology carries on where it left off: one question or check at a time, large buttons.

  • Show that a measurement check cannot be verified without a measured value (the button is locked until the value is filled in).
  • Press 🎤 and dictate an observation — the text lands in the field, editable, and is saved only when you press Save. Speech in, text out; nothing is sent automatically.
  • Show the category buttons (active diagnosis / waiting / road test …) — time reporting takes care of itself.

4. The work log (1 min)

The Logg tab: every event timestamped with its user, append-only — nothing can be changed or deleted afterwards. Point out the handover between Anna and Johan.

5. The customer report and Live Share (2 min)

The Rapport tab:

  • Print / PDF — the report becomes black on white automatically.
  • Export JSON — versioned (version = number of events), and the export logs itself.
  • Open Live Share view — what the customer sees through the share link: status ✔/🔄/, images, measured values, timeline. No hypotheses, no internal entries.

The point: instead of "Diagnosis — 2.5 hours" on the invoice, the customer gets a timeline of what was actually done.

6. Close with the philosophy (30 sec)

The system documents observations, leads the user through verifiable checks and recommends the next step — but never presents a hypothesis as a confirmed fault.

It does not replace the technician. It replaces the binder, the sticky notes, and "ask Kent, he was working on it on Thursday".

What is demo mode and what is production

In the demo In production
Deterministic methodology engine (16 methodologies) The model selects/generates steps through the same engine interface
The browser's speech recognition The vendor's voice-to-text behind the same interface
localStorage + sync on login Multi-tenant backend (the migration exists), roles per the Master Prompt
Share link requires a synced case Live Share with permission levels customer/internal/partner
Demo images drawn by the system Real photos via the camera (already works in the demo too)